749Psi Research ArchiveBUREAU 749

Pyrokinesis

Controlling fire, producing flames

Reality checkNo one starts fire by will; ‘spontaneous human combustion’ has cases with official coroner verdicts, but the mainstream explanation is the ‘wick effect’; firewalking is explained by physics.
Go to full archive →

The Mary Reeser case

🏛️ Official record
US Federal Bureau of Investigation · USA, St. Petersburg FL · 1951

A 67-year-old woman was reduced to ashes in her flat, leaving one slippered foot, with nearby furniture nearly intact; the FBI concluded a ‘wick effect’ — clothing ignited, then body fat sustained the burn.

VerdictThe most famous ‘SHC’ file; officials reject a supernatural explanation.
Source ↗

The Michael Faherty case: coroner rules ‘combustion’

🏛️ Official record
Galway coroner Ciaran McLoughlin, Ireland · Ireland, Galway · 2010 (ruled 2011)

A 76-year-old burned to death at home with no accelerant and no source; the coroner recorded ‘spontaneous human combustion’ as cause — an Irish first.

VerdictAn official ‘combustion’ verdict merely means cause unknown.
Source ↗

The Carole Compton ‘haunted nanny’ case

📜 On record
Livorno court, Italy · Italy · 1982–1983

A Scottish nanny had repeated unexplained fires at Italian employers’ homes and was charged with arson and attempted murder, the press calling it ‘pyrokinesis’; in 1983 convicted of arson but released in court.

VerdictA judicial record exists; ‘pyrokinesis’ unproven.
Source ↗

The physics of firewalking

🎓 Academic research
UCLA physicist Bernard Leikind (Skeptical Inquirer 1985) · USA · 1985

Charcoal conducts heat poorly and foot contact is brief, so ordinary people can walk across safely doing no ‘work’.

VerdictNo superpower needed.
Source ↗

🔥 Elemental

🌐 zh-Hanszh-Hantenfresjakohi